Legal Battle Over Workplace Safety: A Former Singapore Airlines Cabin Crew Member's Lawsuit - Istanbul Airport Meet and Assist

Introduction to the Case

The aviation industry, known for its strict safety protocols and procedures, is currently witnessing a legal challenge that puts workplace safety under scrutiny. A former cabin crew member of Singapore Airlines, Durairaj Santiran, aged 36, has initiated a lawsuit against the airline, alleging negligence in maintaining a safe working environment. The incident in question occurred on a flight from San Francisco, United States, to Singapore on September 5, 2019, aboard an Airbus A350. Santiran claims that he slipped and fell on a grease patch while performing his duties, leading to a significant injury—a slipped disc. This case has garnered attention due to its implications for airline safety standards and employee welfare.

Details of the Incident and Legal Proceedings

According to reports by the broadcaster CNA, the incident took a severe toll on Santiran’s health and professional life. He appeared in court on February 13, 2024, in Singapore, donning a brace for support, which underscored the gravity of his injuries. Santiran’s legal team argued that the airline failed to ensure a safe working environment by not adequately addressing the hazard posed by the grease patch. This negligence, they claim, led to an unsafe area where the plaintiff ultimately sustained his injuries. During the court proceedings, it emerged that Santiran had noticed the grease patch before takeoff and had reported it to his superior, who initially instructed him to clean it. Despite attempts to address the issue, the grease patch remained, leading to Santiran’s fall as he was serving customers, resulting in him hitting his head and suffering a slipped disc. The aftermath of the fall saw Santiran being wheeled off the aircraft upon arrival at Singapore Changi Airport (SIN).

Contesting Claims and Ongoing Trial

The defense, representing Singapore Airlines, has contested the accuracy of Santiran’s account, particularly questioning the presence of the grease patch and its role in the plaintiff’s injuries. During cross-examination, discrepancies in the timeline of events and the efforts made to remove the grease patch were highlighted, adding complexity to the case. The defense’s stance is that even if there was a grease patch, it was not the cause of Santiran’s injuries. This legal battle has brought to the forefront issues of workplace safety, employer responsibilities, and the mechanisms in place to prevent such accidents. Santiran is seeking $1.26 million in damages, including compensation for future loss of earnings, as the trial continues to unfold.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *